logging-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ralph Goers <rgo...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Proposal: annual chair election
Date Thu, 21 Jun 2012 06:10:46 GMT
I am in favor of this and frankly wish it was ASF policy. IMO doing this annually is good for
the project and and should make the existing chair feel like it isn't happening because people
are unhappy with them.  If we do this I would suggest adding it to the Logging project guidelines
page  with a fixed date.


On Jun 20, 2012, at 9:57 PM, Christian Grobmeier <grobmeier@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello all,
> I recently thought about the role of the Chair in an ASF project.
> Basically the Chair is the connection between project and the team. In
> well working projects it means the chair writes reports and has
> basically little to do. Still it seems that the chair gets some extra
> attention when it is about decision making and performing new ideas. I
> recently could observe this at the Apache Incubator. The Incubator has
> (had) some problems and there were heated discussion how to solve it.
> Finally Jukka Zitting arrived and somehow everybody trusted him
> immediately. Jukka was elected as a chair and started to change things
> in the Incubator. I must say he really does a great job and the
> Incubator has become a better place now.
> One could say, Jukka could have done this job as PMC and there is no
> need to be chair. But in fact, I feel this is wrong and just gray
> theory. I am pretty sure electing him as a chair was a wise decision
> and gave him the chance to influence the project more.
> That being said I think we need to do an annual election for this chair role.
> If there are no other chair volunteers, the election is easy: just
> confirm the current chair. If others want to take this role, let's
> elect.
> Why should one become a chair?
> I guess, sometimes it is just interesting and exciting to look more
> into the details of the ASF. I am not sure what my reasons are
> exactly, but it's some combination of interest and fun. And I like
> this community and want to help.
> With an annual election we would have the chance to get a yearly fresh
> breath into this project. In addition, the weight of this role is not
> so heavy as with an unlimited period.
> Thoughts?
> Cheers
> Christian

View raw message