logging-log4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Curt Arnold <carn...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Release of log4j version 1.2.10
Date Sat, 30 Apr 2005 15:57:36 GMT
I have added a mild disclaimer to binary distributions page in the CVS 
for logging-site.  I also added a link to the cvsweb for 
logging-chainsaw.  At the moment, the pages served by 
logging.apache.org do not show either modification.  I'm hoping it is a 
replication lag.

Given that there was no vote on log4j 1.2.10 and significant issues 
worthy of discussion, I felt that is was essential that there be some 
disclaimer so that unsuspecting visitors to the log4j web site would 
not download a supposed production release that does not have the 
endorsement of the PMC.  Text is:

Disclaimer: This release was posted without a required vote and may be 

In my previous message, I had attempted to describe one mechanism that 
an SLF4J facade over log4j could offer comparable performance to a 
direct implementation of SLF4J within log4j.  There are likely other 
approaches that could also work and the one I outlined may not be the 
best.   The intent was not to start a discussion on how write a 
performant facade, but that there was the potential for a performant 
facade so committing to a direct implementation in a production release 
was premature.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org

View raw message