logging-log4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Womack <mwom...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [COMPATIBILITY] Current state
Date Mon, 06 Feb 2006 17:01:07 GMT
Jess, can you write these 2 up as bugs?

Thanks for the review!

-Mark

On 2/4/06, Jess Holle <jessh@ptc.com> wrote:
> Another issue:
>
> log4j 1.3 alpha 8 triggers throws SecurityExceptions when you attempt to
> use it from within an applet in a Java 5 JVM.
>
> [It attempts to read a system property during LogManager static
> initialization without wrapping this in a try/catch.]
>
> Jess Holle wrote:
> > Oh.  I mispoke slightly -- I had to leave one change in place.
> >
> > DailyRollingFileAppender no longer extends FileAppender in log4j 1.3
> > alpha 8, which is noticeable to my code.  I already had workarounds in
> > place, however, so I just need to keep those in place.
> >
> > --
> > Jess Holle
> >
> > Jess Holle wrote:
> >> I just tried the new alpha-8 version (finally).
> >>
> >> I had no compatibility issues whatsoever with my code (which was all
> >> compiled against 1.2.13 with Java 1.5.0_06).
> >>
> >> I was able to clean up the code I had previously added to try to be
> >> more 1.3 compatible -- but I left some dynamic-proxy-based code to
> >> use LoggerEventListener when it's available and fall back to
> >> HierarchyEventListener when it's not.  I noted that 1.3 alpha 8 had
> >> the necessary source changes so I would not have *needed* to do this
> >> -- I just wanted to receive levelChangedEvent() calls when possible
> >> (so I can fire JMX notifications on this basis).
> >>
> >> Overall 1.3 alpha 8 worked just fine from my short testing.  Good
> >> work everyone!
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jess Holle
> >>
> >> Jess Holle wrote:
> >>> Mark Womack wrote:
> >>>> Jesse, we'll be very interested in what you find compatibility-wise
> >>>> with the new alpha-8 version.
> >>>>
> >>>> :-)
> >>> Sorry, I've been preoccupied with a number of other efforts and have
> >>> not had time to check yet.
> >>>
> >>> Doing so would clearly be a good thing, though....
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Jess Holle
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org


Mime
View raw message