logging-log4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42823] - Setting trigger on SMTPAppender unnecessarily complicated
Date Fri, 06 Jul 2007 04:37:29 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42823>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42823





------- Additional Comments From carnold@apache.org  2007-07-05 21:37 -------
Another possibility would be to support o.a.l.rolling.TriggeringPolicy.  That would superset
the capabilities 
of a triggeringFilter since there is a FilterBasedTriggeringPolicy in o.a.l.rolling plus it
would allow size 
based triggering (however msg size is not currently calculated).  However, that would require
moving 
o.a.l.rolling.TriggeringPolicy from extras to log4j proper and other unpleasantness.

Probably best just to add setTrigger(Level) and leave the fancy stuff for log4j 2.0.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org


Mime
View raw message