logging-log4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Gregory <GGreg...@seagullsoftware.com>
Subject RE: Modular Build
Date Wed, 07 Apr 2010 20:16:38 GMT
IMO, keeping it simple is best. Same for deliverables, the fewer jars the better.

Gary Gregory
Senior Software Engineer
Seagull Software
email: ggregory@seagullsoftware.com
email: ggregory@apache.org
www.seagullsoftware.com 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Antony Stubbs [mailto:antony.stubbs@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 13:09
> To: log4j-dev@logging.apache.org
> Subject: Modular Build
> 
> Hi guys, what's the established opinion from log4j about breaking
> log4j up into modules ie net, nt appender, chainsaw etc?
> 
> Regards,
> Antony Stubbs
> Technical Architect - Prototyping
> Telecom Retail
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org


Mime
View raw message