logging-log4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Christian Grobmeier" <grobme...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Next release of 2.0
Date Thu, 02 Jan 2014 15:27:26 GMT
Why the caution?

We can have a 3.0, a 2.1 and son on.

Nobody expects we should stick forever with a version.
On the other hand, we were releasing in beta for ages now.

What are the reasons you don't want a 2.0 stable?

On 2 Jan 2014, at 14:04, Gary Gregory wrote:

> Make it RC or another beta IMO. Once 2.0 is out you cannot unhinged 
> that bell. 
>
> Gary
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Ralph Goers <ralph.goers@dslextreme.com>
> Date:01/02/2014  02:46  (GMT-05:00)
> To: Log4J Developers List <log4j-dev@logging.apache.org>
> Subject: Next release of 2.0
>
> I am trying to find a bit more time to work on Log4j again.  I see 
> quite a few issues that I would like to address and think I will need 
> about 2 weeks to complete them so I am tentatively targeting the 
> middle of the month for the next release.   The question in my mind 
> is whether the next release should be 2.0-RC1 or just 2.0.
>
> Ralph
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org


---
http://www.grobmeier.de
The Zen Programmer: http://bit.ly/12lC6DL
@grobmeier
GPG: 0xA5CC90DB

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org


Mime
View raw message