logging-log4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Logo Contest
Date Thu, 02 Jan 2014 22:11:52 GMT
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Nick Williams <nicholas@nicholaswilliams.net
> wrote:

> Not yet. There are several outstanding issues regarding the web
> configuration that need to be solved. I plan on tackling them next week.
> I'm finally finishing my book this weekend—four months late. :-(
>
> Nick
>
>
I'm talking about a vote for the logo (the subject of this thread ;)

Gary

On Jan 2, 2014, at 1:23 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> So, should we call for a vote?
>
> Gary
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Paul Benedict
> Date:01/02/2014 11:49 (GMT-05:00)
> To: Log4J Developers List
> Subject: Re: Logo Contest
>
> I think holding up the final release for the logo shouldn't be too
> desired. I am patiently waiting for 2.0 to hit GA and the logo is
> superfluous to my usage.
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Ralph Goers <ralph.goers@dslextreme.com>wrote:
>
>> There have been many candidates submitted in the Logo contest [1] which
>> can be viewed at http://www.fdmhosting.com/log4j2/.  I am going to be
>> honest and say that none of them grabs me and says “that’s the one”,
>> although I like the ideas expressed in quite a few of them.  I definitely
>> like the play on version 2 and using it as a superscript to make it appear
>> as log4j squared.   Many of the logos just feel too big to me - they have
>> Log4j adjacent to the image, making them take up a lot of horizontal space.
>> On the images themselves, I really like the coffee cup submitted by Murad,
>>   I like the script used by Andreas but I would prefer that the 4 was
>> facing the correct direction and that the 2 superscript be to the right of
>> the 4 instead of to the left.  I think many of the graphics submitted by
>> Gary are kind of cool - they are very modern looking.
>>
>> Ideally we should pick out a new logo before 2.0 is released so it would
>> be great if we could get more discussion on this.
>>
>> Finally, these are just my opinions.  I won’t be the only one voting so I
>> would definitely like to hear what some of the other PMC members think.
>>
>> Ralph
>>
>>
>> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-316
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Paul
>
>
>


-- 
E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

Mime
View raw message