lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Grant Ingersoll <>
Subject Re: Local Lucene and Local Solr
Date Mon, 15 Sep 2008 19:11:49 GMT
OK, I have completed the software grant for Local Lucene.  See

At this point, there needs to be one or more volunteers to pick up  
doing the work via patches on the issue.


On Sep 2, 2008, at 12:43 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:

> So, the consensus seems to be to split into contrib modules for  
> Lucene Java and Lucene Solr.  I just need to finish up the paperwork  
> over in incubation and then I think we can seek out volunteers on  
> the two lists to do the splitting in conjunction with the people  
> donating the code.
> -Grant
> On Aug 25, 2008, at 2:24 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>> : As to where, from the Solr point of view, a geosearch feature seems
>> : core, thus it should go in Solr core.
>> if i remember correctly,the LocalSolr has been designed/built as a
>> "plugin" so it doesn't actually need to live in the "core" Solr  
>> code base
>> ... it can be a Solr contrib ... but i agree it would probably  
>> makethe
>> most sense for "Local Lucene" to be a Lucene-Java contrib and  
>> "Local Solr"
>> to be a Solr contrib ... haveing a seperate "Geo" subproject might  
>> make
>> sense from a code management standpoint, but not really from a
>> dependency/release management or user base standpoint ... either  
>> people want to use
>> LocalLucene directly (in which case they don't care about the Solr  
>> pieces)
>> or they care about using Local Solr (and don't know they care about  
>> the
>> Lucene piece)
>> -Hoss

View raw message