lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jae Joo <jaejo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Function Query Optimization
Date Mon, 14 Dec 2020 14:36:07 GMT
Should SubQuery be faster than FunctionQuery?

On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 10:24 AM Vincenzo D'Amore <v.damore@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi, looking at this sample it seems you have just one document for '12345',
> one for '23456' and so on so forth. If this is true, why don't just try
> with a subquery
>
> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/transforming-result-documents.html#TransformingResultDocuments-_subquery_
>
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 3:31 PM Jae Joo <jaejoo18@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I have the requirement to create field  - xyz to be returned based on the
> > matched result.
> > Here Is the code .
> >
> > XYZ:concat(
> >
> >     if(exists(query({!v='field1:12345'})), '<G>12345</G>', ''),
> >
> >     if(exists(query({!v='field1:23456'})), '<G>23456</G>', ''),
> >
> >     if(exists(query({!v='field1:34567'})), '<G>34567</G>', ''),
> >
> >     if(exists(query({!v='field:45678'})), '<G>45678</G>','')
> > ),
> >
> > I am feeling this is very complex, so I am looking for some smart and
> > faster ideas.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jae
> >
>
>
> --
> Vincenzo D'Amore
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message