mahout-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Dunning <>
Subject Re: mahout tf-idf vs lucene tf-idf
Date Sat, 04 Jun 2016 10:12:11 GMT
On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 10:14 AM, forme book <> wrote:

> On the (Lucene side) has already by default this implementations, what I do
> struggle to understand what is the advantage of having lucene.vector in
> mahout when Lucene offer that feature out of the box ?
> Maybe I'm missing something big but what’s the Connection Between then ?
>  could you please explain a possible user case ?

The point of the Mahout implementation is that it worked well with the
Mahout math library.

If you don't need any of the other machinery of Mahout, then avoiding the
extra dependency might be a much better option for you.

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message