Hi Phil,Thanks -- this information is more helpful.So my understanding is that there is an external site reference in your site/subsite hierarchy? And the *root* site (the one that you point at when you configure the connection itself) is *not* external after all?If that is the case, then the external site must be being "discovered" through the Webs service API call. There are two ways forward:(1) We can change the Webs response parsing to detect external sites and not include those in the crawl, or(2) We can try to make decisions based on whether a 302 comes back as a response code.(1) is by far the best approach but it will require some cooperation and execution of sample code on your part. Essentially I'll need to see what the xml is that is coming back that first describes the exterrnal site and see if there is an attribute that lets us know it is external. That way I properly just skip it entirely.We can have a look at what comes back from SharePoint for this API response if you enable connector debugging in properties.xml:<property name="org.apache.manifoldcf.connectors" value="DEBUG"/>... and restart. You will then need to do a crawl. The following line will be what you look for:Logging.connectors.debug("SharePoint: getSites xml response: "+xmlResponse);This xml response will contain "Url" and "Title" nodes; what I need to know is whether there's any attribute of the "Url" node, or parallel node other than "Url" or "Title', that contains an indication of whether the Url that describes the external site is indeed external. So you look for the Url that describes the SharePoint URL that has the redirection, and tell me if there's anything special about it in the associated getSites response. Does that make sense?If this is too hard, alternative (2) is possible, but it will require tons of individual changes. So let's look into (1) first.ThanksKarlOn Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 11:49 PM, Phil Riethmuller <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:Hi Karl,Some further info:
- The problem document that Manifold reported, is redirecting to an external site.
- We tried crawling a smaller subset of content on the same Sharepoint site that definitely doesn’t contain any external links in the content, and this works OK.
- The job that errors with the 302, says it has found 529 docs so far and processed 127 of them. This seems to indicate that is has in fact found some documents.I’m not sure what you mean that the error is being generated from the API call, and not an individual document? The info appears to indicate it is not all documents, but just selected documents.There really isn’t much we can do about this from the Sharepoint configuration side, is there any way we can test if it is as simple as the 302 coming from the documents themselves?Thanks for your help to date.PhilFrom: Karl Wright <email@example.com>
Date: Thursday, 18 February 2016 10:31 amHi Phil,The 302 error is not coming from a single document. If it *was* coming from the fetch of an individual document, it would be easy to work around. But, from your stack trace, it is clear that this error is coming from an API call, specifically a call to enumerate subsites of a given site. That means that some or all of the SharePoint hierarchy is not accessible through POST requests. I have never seen this kind of behavior from SharePoint before.This is not something that I can work around without more information. In order to get that information, you will at the very minimum need to turn on connector debugging, and probably turning on http wire debugging would be helpful too. And, if what you said about the View page for this connection is true and it also shows a 302 error, I very much suspect that something changed on the server end and you are currently unable to crawl *any* documents at all.I am sorry I cannot make this any clearer.Thanks,KarlOn Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Phil Riethmuller <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:Hi Karl,Thanks for the update.I’m not 100% sure how many documents have this redirect in them, but I’ll see if I can get a better estimate. The content we are crawling is substantially large, and comes from many different authors so it’s difficult to manage how these Sharepoint documents are created. It makes it extremely difficult to pinpoint all the documents that contain redirects.Am I correct in assuming a single 302 error causes the job to fail, or is there some other logic that determines this?How plausible would it be to include in the product an option for treating 302’s as a warning, rather than a fatal error? Possibly just an option in the Job setup?Regards,PhilFrom: Karl Wright <email@example.com>
Date: Thursday, 18 February 2016 1:39 amHi again Phil,The HttpClient team points out that POST requests (as we do for the SharePoint repository requests) are not allowed to follow 302 redirections according to RFC2616. We use POST requests because, for SOAP, there is often quite a bit of XML data that goes along with the request, and we would otherwise have size issues. So we cannot use GET instead of POST. See CONNECTORS-1279 for details.If you still believe that it is only a couple of URLs that are returning 302 for you, I'd like some analysis of why you believe that to be true. I would be happy to consider recognition of an occasional 302 response as meaning "skip this document". On the other hand, based on your stack trace, it really appears that you have a far more systemic problem; it is failing while obtaining information for an entire site, so not much would get crawled in that case.Thanks,KarlOn Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Karl Wright <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:Hi Phil,It is not surprising that the connector doesn't like 302 responses and doesn't know what to do with them, because it isn't supposed to ever be getting any of these.I am puzzled by your statement that "only a couple of documents have redirections in them", because the connector crawls Lists and Library documents within SharePoint *only*, and these are very specifically accessible through a SharePoint URL hierarchy structure. There's no room in any of that for a 302 redirection. Since you see a 302 in the UI, I feel pretty certain you have a problem with your configuration and it is not just "a couple of documents".KarlOn Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 5:22 PM, Phil Riethmuller <email@example.com> wrote:Thanks Karl,The majority of content is not going to the redirect, it’s probably just a handful of documents that are behaving this way.I’d agree that it’s of lesser concern whether or not the document itself is indexing, however I wouldn’t expect the 302 to be treated as a fatal error that causes the job to come to a halt. I’d expect the document to be passed over, and the crawl to continue.Is the only solution at this point to remove the documents which redirect to a 302 to get the crawl to run in full?Regards,From: Karl Wright <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Wednesday, 17 February 2016 8:58 amHi Phil,You probably want to point your SharePoint repository connection to the proper server and site, and not rely on redirections. It's also possible that you are missing the site entirely and the redirection you are seeing is taking you to some error page somewhere.I will be raising the question of redirections with the HttpComponents/HttpClient team, since I see no obvious problems with the SharePoint connector code. However, if your connection is properly set up, redirections should be unneeded.I would read the documentation on the Wiki page for debugging SharePoint connections at the bottom of this page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CONNECTORS/Debugging+ConnectionsThanks,KarlOn Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Phil Riethmuller <email@example.com> wrote:Do you mean in the job status in the Manifold CF interface?The job status also shows the same:Error: Unexpected http error code 302 accessing SharePoint at <url>: (302)HTTP/1.0 302 FoundI agree, I wouldn’t of thought that the crawler would follow any links or redirections.What sort of configurations could be incorrectly configured, that I could look at revising?PhilFrom: Karl Wright <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Wednesday, 17 February 2016 8:45 amThanks.When you view the repository connection in the UI, do you get a 302 error also?I have looked at the code; Httpclient is supposedly configured to honor redirections. Obviously it is not doing that, so I'll have to dig deeper into why that is. On the other hand, I would not expect you to be getting any redirections, unless you have configured your connection incorrectly.KarlOn Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Phil Riethmuller <email@example.com> wrote:Thanks Karl -I’ve replaced the actual URL with <URL> below, but here is the stack trace:
ERROR 2016-02-16 12:10:55,251 (Worker thread '16') - Exception tossed: Unexpected http error code 302 accessing SharePoint at <URL>: (302)HTTP/1.0 302 Found
org.apache.manifoldcf.core.interfaces.ManifoldCFException: Unexpected http error code 302 accessing SharePoint at <URL>: (302)HTTP/1.0 302 Found
Caused by: (302)HTTP/1.0 302 Found
at org.apache.manifoldcf.crawler.connectors.sharepoint.SPSProxyHelper.getSites(SPSProxyHelper.java:2161)From: Karl Wright <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Tuesday, 16 February 2016 6:54 pm
To: "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: HTTP 302 error causing job to abortHi Phil,A HTTP 302 response is simply a redirection. It should not, by itself, cause a job to abort. I would expect that to go by in wire/http logging, but you should not see it anywhere else. So it is not clear to me what you are really seeing here.Can you include an example stack trace from the manifoldcf log?KarlOn Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 12:22 AM, Phil Riethmuller <email@example.com> wrote:Hi -When crawling a Sharepoint repository, I’m receiving a HTTP 302 error which is causing the manifold job to abort. How do I prevent the crawler from aborting the job?I’m using v2.3 of Manifold with a postgres database.Regards,Phil