nifi-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mike Thomsen <mikerthom...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Stability of the Record API
Date Thu, 09 Aug 2018 09:58:07 GMT
I think that comment is no longer valid. Heck PutHBaseRecord started as
part of a project at my company in early 2017 and we found it perfectly
stable back then.
On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 11:46 PM Otto Fowler <ottobackwards@gmail.com> wrote:

> I’m seeing
>
> https://github.com/apache/nifi/blob/master/nifi-commons/nifi-record/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/serialization/RecordReader.java#L34
> being quoted as a reason to NOT build Record based processors but instead
> stick with the original Processor api.
>
> Yet, on list and on hipchat and in pr’s I’ve seen the Record approach being
> promoted heavily.
>
> Is this comment still correct?  Is the API not considered stable?
> Would the NiFi project recommend building externally hosted NiFi components
> using the Record API?
>
> ottO
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message