nifi-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [discuss] approaching a NiFi 1.10.0 release
Date Tue, 15 Oct 2019 14:57:54 GMT
Thanks team.  Progressing RC for 1.10.0 tasks now.



On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 12:55 PM Bryan Bende <bbende@gmail.com> wrote:

> Done!
>
> On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 12:37 PM Mike Thomsen <mikerthomsen@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Could we get this small PR merged (reviews appear to be done)?
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3723
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 5:55 AM koterada@yahoo-corp.jp <
> > koterada@yahoo-corp.jp> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Pierre,
> > > Thanks for your quick reviews!
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Kotaro Terada
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > > 差出人: Pierre Villard <pierre.villard.fr@gmail.com>
> > > 送信日時: Thursday, October 3, 2019 6:40:29 PM
> > > 宛先: dev@nifi.apache.org <dev@nifi.apache.org>
> > > 件名: Re: [discuss] approaching a NiFi 1.10.0 release
> > >
> > > Thanks Koji, I went ahead and squashed/merged the PR into master,
> thanks!
> > > Kotaro, I took care of your two PRs, thanks for fixing the issues!
> > >
> > > Pierre
> > >
> > > Le jeu. 3 oct. 2019 à 10:44, koterada@yahoo-corp.jp <
> > > koterada@yahoo-corp.jp>
> > > a écrit :
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I found some bugs in PrometheusReportingTask (which is newly
> introduced
> > > in
> > > > 1.10) and I already sent PRs for fixing them (NIFI-6716<
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-6716> and NIFI-6715<
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-6715>).
> > > >
> > > > Could someone take a look into them, please? I think it's better to
> > > handle
> > > > them before the 1.10 release, if possible.
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Kotaro Terada
> > > >
> > > > ________________________________
> > > > 差出人: Koji Kawamura <ijokarumawak@gmail.com>
> > > > 送信日時: 2019年10月3日 9:04
> > > > 宛先: dev <dev@nifi.apache.org>
> > > > 件名: Re: [discuss] approaching a NiFi 1.10.0 release
> > > >
> > > > Hi Pierre,
> > > >
> > > > The PR3394 looks good, but is hard to merge to master without
> manually
> > > > resolving conflict, at least with the commands I know. Please see my
> > > > comment on the PR.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Koji
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 1:59 AM Pierre Villard
> > > > <pierre.villard.fr@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Someone willing to merge https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3394?
> > > It's
> > > > > been reviewed, just wanted to avoid merging my own PR.
> > > > >
> > > > > Le mer. 2 oct. 2019 à 18:44, Jeff <jtswork@gmail.com> a écrit
:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Joe,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > NIFI-6275 [1] has been resolved, and PR 3483 [2] has been merged
> to
> > > > master.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-6275
> > > > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3483
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 12:30 AM Jeff <jtswork@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks Joe!  I should have an update/resolution for NIFI-6275
> > > > tomorrow.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 11:48 PM Joe Witt <joe.witt@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> Team,
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> We are pretty much there now it looks like for a 1.10.0.
 In
> > > > scanning
> > > > > > >> through this thread it looks like the ListHDFS ask
from Jeff
> is
> > > > perhaps
> > > > > > >> the
> > > > > > >> only remaining bit.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> I'll probably create the RC branch soon so folks can
keep
> moving
> > > on
> > > > > > master
> > > > > > >> and I'll try to pull in other things that look
> > > ready/reviewed/etc..
> > > > that
> > > > > > >> might work.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> If you look here
> > > > > > >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NIFI/versions/12344993 we
> > > > > > already
> > > > > > >> have a *TON* of features/fixes/improvements loaded
up on this
> > > > release.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> My goal is to initiate the RC processes this week.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Huge thanks to the many many folks that contributed
to
> getting us
> > > > this
> > > > > > far
> > > > > > >> in this release.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Thanks!
> > > > > > >> Joe
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 4:21 AM Pierre Villard <
> > > > > > >> pierre.villard.fr@gmail.com>
> > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> > +1 for getting a 1.10.0 release soon - a lot of
great
> things has
> > > > been
> > > > > > >> > added.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > If I may ask, it would be great to have a +1 from
a
> committer on
> > > > > > >> NIFI-6159
> > > > > > >> > [1].
> > > > > > >> > The PR has been reviewed by turcsanyip but it
would need a
> final
> > > > go
> > > > > > >> from a
> > > > > > >> > committer.
> > > > > > >> > However, I do understand that other PRs mentioned
in this
> thread
> > > > are
> > > > > > >> more
> > > > > > >> > important (bug related).
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > [1] https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3394
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Thanks,
> > > > > > >> > Pierre
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Le ven. 30 août 2019 à 08:21, Jeff <jtswork@gmail.com>
a
> écrit
> > > :
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > > I'd also like to get the PR [1] for NIFI-6275
merged
> before
> > > > 1.10.0
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > >> > > released.  It's an update to ListHDFS so
that the scheme
> and
> > > > > > authority
> > > > > > >> > are
> > > > > > >> > > ignored when using the "Full Path" filter
mode.
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > [1] https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3483
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 10:04 PM Aldrin Piri
<
> > > > aldrinpiri@gmail.com>
> > > > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > > I created NIFI-6604 [1] to reduce assembly
size and
> listed
> > > it
> > > > as a
> > > > > > >> > > Blocker
> > > > > > >> > > > for this release.  The issue has a link
to the
> associated
> > > > > > discussion
> > > > > > >> > > thread
> > > > > > >> > > > and an initial PR.
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > --aldrin
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-6604
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 4:08 PM Matt
Burgess <
> > > > mattyb149@gmail.com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > Mike,
> > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > I’ll review those two graph PRs
tonight or tomorrow
> (if
> > > > they’re
> > > > > > >> still
> > > > > > >> > > > open
> > > > > > >> > > > > by then)
> > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Aug 29, 2019, at 3:43 PM,
Mike Thomsen <
> > > > > > >> mikerthomsen@gmail.com>
> > > > > > >> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > I have two open graph-related
PR's that are really
> small
> > > > and
> > > > > > are
> > > > > > >> > > needed
> > > > > > >> > > > > to
> > > > > > >> > > > > > close some bugs that will
be bad for early adopters:
> > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3571
> > > > > > >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3572
> > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > If someone wants to review,
that'd be great.
> Otherwise,
> > > I
> > > > can
> > > > > > >> merge
> > > > > > >> > > > them
> > > > > > >> > > > > in
> > > > > > >> > > > > > because I'm doing daily work
on some graph stuff
> using a
> > > > > > branch
> > > > > > >> > based
> > > > > > >> > > > on
> > > > > > >> > > > > > both patches.
> > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > Mike
> > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > >> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at
2:12 PM Joe Witt <
> > > > joe.witt@gmail.com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> > > > > >> We had another discuss
on that recently and the
> intent
> > > > is to
> > > > > > >> drop
> > > > > > >> > a
> > > > > > >> > > > few
> > > > > > >> > > > > >> toys off the raft and
update migration guidance.
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> > > > > >> Thanks
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019
at 2:02 PM Jeremy Dyer <
> > > > > > jdye64@gmail.com
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> +1 looking forward
to this.
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> I recall seeing some
issues about Apache Infra
> and the
> > > > > > binary
> > > > > > >> > size.
> > > > > > >> > > > > Were
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> all of those appropriate
modules removed as
> discussed
> > > > and
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > >> > build
> > > > > > >> > > > > size
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> will be small enough
now?
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>> On Thu, Aug 29,
2019 at 1:35 PM Bryan Bende <
> > > > > > >> bbende@gmail.com>
> > > > > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>> +1 Looking forward
to getting parameters and
> Java 11
> > > > > > support
> > > > > > >> out
> > > > > > >> > > > there
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>> in a release.
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>>> On Thu, Aug
29, 2019 at 1:02 PM Joe Witt <
> > > > > > >> joewitt@apache.org>
> > > > > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>>> Team,
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>>> It looks like
we're reaching a point in which
> it is
> > > > time
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > >> > close
> > > > > > >> > > > in
> > > > > > >> > > > > >> on
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>>> 1.10.
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-6595?jql=project%20%3D%20NIFI%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.10.0
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>>> There are
250+ issues in there nearly 240 of
> which
> > > are
> > > > > > >> already
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>> resolved.  I
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>>> haven't gone
through yet for fully analyzing
> but the
> > > > > > awesome
> > > > > > >> > Java
> > > > > > >> > > > 11
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> work
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>>> Jeff Storck
and others has done means we can now
> > > > build on
> > > > > > >> Java
> > > > > > >> > 11
> > > > > > >> > > > as
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> well
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>>> as run on
it.  There is a ton of great work on
> > > > parameters
> > > > > > >> which
> > > > > > >> > > > will
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> make
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>>> managing flows
at scale much easier.  We will
> need
> > > to
> > > > drop
> > > > > > >> some
> > > > > > >> > > > nars
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>> which
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>>> means we have
some migration guidance to update.
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>>> I'd like to
volunteer as RM but if there are any
> > > other
> > > > > > >> takers
> > > > > > >> > > > please
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> let
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>> me
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>>> know.
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>>> As we close
in on releases this tends to create
> a
> > > lot
> > > > of
> > > > > > >> > urgency
> > > > > > >> > > to
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>> quickly
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>>> try to get
new things in.  I will try to manage
> this
> > > > well.
> > > > > > >> As
> > > > > > >> > > > always
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> we
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>>> can do another
release.  There is no timeline
> > > pushing
> > > > us
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > >> > have
> > > > > > >> > > > such
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>> gaps
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>>> between releases...we
can always do another
> feature
> > > > > > release.
> > > > > > >> > > That
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> said,
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>> PR
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>>> review bandwidth
is at a super premium.  We
> receive
> > > a
> > > > lot
> > > > > > >> more
> > > > > > >> > > PRs
> > > > > > >> > > > > >> than
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>> we
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>>> do receive
reviews.  We'll have to work this as
> the
> > > PR
> > > > > > depth
> > > > > > >> > > grows.
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>>> Thanks
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>>> Joe
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message