ode-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Maciej Szefler" <...@intalio.com>
Subject Re: Ode and JSR170
Date Wed, 05 Sep 2007 19:34:27 GMT
so the hand-coding of jdbc i mentioned involves the code used to route
messages to the appropriate instance. i'm guessing it might not practical to
get that working using a content repository, since it is very
"transactional" and prone to dead-lock.

-mbs

On 9/5/07, harvey waters <harvey.waters@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> I was thinking of that as well. The main issue I guess would be to get
> ode's
> unit tests running against a new dao layer. Does anyone know if this is
> achievable ?
>
> On 9/5/07, Philipp Koch <philipp.koch@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > hi,
> > there is a ocm (object content mapping) (sub) project in the
> > jackrabbit contrib folder
> > (
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/trunk/contrib/jackrabbit-jcr-mapping/
> > )
> > which might be from interesst.
> >
> > regards, philipp
> >
> > On 9/4/07, harvey waters <harvey.waters@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > Well I know the JSR170 but not the ode. What do you mean by the
> message
> > > correlation code would need to be hand coded, do you just mean a piece
> > of
> > > code that would be specifically hand coded for the JSR170 DAO's.
> > >
> > > On 9/4/07, Maciej Szefler <mbs@intalio.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > don't know much about JCR, but yes, in theory you'd need to
> > reimplement
> > > > the
> > > > DAO in the JCR170 "medium". A warning though, there are things that
> > you
> > > > would almost certainly create problems, in particular the message
> > > > correlation code really needs to be hand-coded in something like
> JDBC
> > to
> > > > work correctly.
> > > >
> > > > -mbs
> > > >
> > > > On 9/4/07, harvey waters <harvey.waters@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Would the bean encoder be a better appoach than developing a
> jcrDAO
> > > > layer
> > > > > ?
> > > > > are you thinking that the bean encoder would allow you to use
> other
> > > > > repositories than the jsr170 ?
> > > > >
> > > > > On 9/4/07, Nicolas Modrzyk <Nicolas.Modrzyk@macnica.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hey Harvey,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Storing a workflow has been done in the magnolia CMS.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You may be interested in looking at:
> > > > > > http://www.openwfe.org/openwfe-jcr-beancoder.html
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It should be quite easy to plug it or something similar to ODE.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Niko,
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sep 4, 2007, at 6:00 PM, harvey waters wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I would like to use ode with a jsr170 persistance layer
> (Apache
> > > > > > > JackRabbit),
> > > > > > > basically I want to be able to be able to persist the workflow
> > (and
> > > > > > > its
> > > > > > > state) in the content repository. Am I right in thinking
that
> I
> > > > > > > would need
> > > > > > > to develop a jsr170 dao layer. Is this feasable and is
there
> > > > > > > someone out
> > > > > > > there who is already doing it ?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Harvey
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message