openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kay Schenk <kay.sch...@gmail.com>
Subject RE: [Discuss] Review and improve graphics memory handling
Date Wed, 17 Jun 2015 04:12:48 GMT
On Jun 8, 2015 8:46 AM, "Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org>
wrote:
>
> I've never understood this business of having multiple releases as
progressions on the same code branch.
>
> It seems far more confusing than having a branch or tag that corresponds
to the release identifier.

Actually before 4.1.1, we did use "tags" if memory serves. I just assumed
we could do this again for 4.1.2 unless there was some reason not to.

I also find the revision cut used for 4.1.1 confusing. In reality, we could
do a tag for it I think.

  It also helps if there is a need for a patch release at a particular
branch.
>
> It also makes check-out of a specific release branch easier.  And it is
easy to confirm the archive of the released source against its SVN.
>
> Although there is a lot of code involved, I thought SVN used a Copy on
Write strategy so copying code into a branch does not create actual copies
but links, with copies made only when a difference is introduced at either
end of the link.  Am I mistaken?
>
> I don't have much skin in this game.  It just strikes me that there is a
high risk of confusion and possible error this way.  Even if a 412 is built
from a copy of 411, rather than the trunk, with changes then cherry-picked
into it, it seems easier to inspect and to understand.
>
>  - Dennis
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pescetti@apache.org]
> Sent: Sunday, June 7, 2015 18:57
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Discuss] Review and improve graphics memory handling
>
> On 02/06/2015 Armin.Le.Grand@me.com wrote:
> > AFAIU AOO410 branch goes on for 411, 412, 413... versions. One branch
> > for next mid-number change, e.g. AOO420 would need a new one. For AOO411
> > we have no extra branch AFAIK, only a revision number in AOO410 branch.
> > I would keep that schema - the goal of micro releases is minor
> > changes/stability, no need for a new branch
>
> I'm OK with this. I will commit changes to the existing AOO410 branch
> instead of creating AOO412 then.
>
> Regards,
>    Andrea.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message