openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Andreas S├Ąger" <saege...@t-online.de>
Subject Re: [QUESTION] Usability of Non-Optional Java Dependencies
Date Tue, 03 Nov 2015 11:48:49 GMT
Am 03.11.2015 um 01:23 schrieb Patricia Shanahan:

> I have no idea of the frequency of that situation.
> 

Hi,

On the user forum it occurs several times per month.
The list box of availlable JREs should not include 64-bit JREs.
It should have a label such as "Suitable 32-bit Java Runtimes on this
system:" plus an additional [Help] button, tool-tip and everything that
helps to resolve the situation without asking someone else for help. As
far as I know, help contents are partially platform specific anyway.
I don't know if possible, but there should be a one-click hyperlink to a
32-bit JRE. The official Oracle link to a manual download goes as far as
> http://www.java.com/de/download/manual.jsp

Oh, and I suppose it should (and could) be an ordinary list box without
any radio buttons.

This is a localized version (/de/ German) of the manual download page
where the user needs to know that the second link [Windows Offline]
http://javadl.sun.com/webapps/download/AutoDL?BundleId=111687 is the one
to download but NOT [Windows Online] and NOT [Windows Offline 64-bit].
Of course, the BundleID changes with every Java update.
And yes, this is Java8 and it works well although AOO specifies Java7.
IMHO, a hyperlink on a help page leading to the English
http://www.java.com/en/download/manual.jsp together with a localized
hint to download and install the 32-bit JRE labeled "Windows Offline"
could improve the situtation.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


Mime
View raw message