openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Branko ─îibej <br...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [discussion] svn migration plan
Date Sun, 21 Jul 2019 09:17:53 GMT
On Sun, 21 Jul 2019, 07:25 Mechtilde, <ooo@mechtilde.de> wrote:

> Hello Branko,
>
> Am 21.07.19 um 02:01 schrieb Branko ─îibej:
> > On Sun, 21 Jul 2019, 01:42 Peter Kovacs, <petko@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi brane,
> >>
> >> The threads are linked in my first post.
> >>
> >
> > Thanks ... Sorry I missed those.
> >
> >
> >> It is for me a workflow thing.
> >> I need a decentral versioning system instead of a central one.
> >>
> >
> >
> > Which particular "decentralised" feature do you miss most? For example,
> > there's work going on to implement client-side shelving (similar to 'git
> > stash'), it's experimental but available in various forms  in the last 3
> > Subversion (minor) releases
>
> Most of the missing features were the reason why Git was developed.
> As Peter said SVN is centralized, Git is decentralized.
> With Git you can do your own home branch without publishing for testing.
> And then you can do a Merge Request (on Github it is named Pull Request)
>
> With Git you need one Repo e.g. with the two branches trunk and 42x.
> With SVN you have two branches to checkout. So you need double space to
> hold the repo locally for testing
>


This last isn't strictly true (see 'svn switch'), but it doesn't really
matter; I'm not trying to change anyone's mind, just to understand your
motivation.

Thanks everyone for your explanations. In time, we'll make Subversion so
much better that it'll wipe Git off the map. :)

-- Brane

>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message