openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: AOO418 cherry picks
Date Tue, 08 Sep 2020 17:53:07 GMT
Are these in trunk, or 4.2.x?

> On Sep 7, 2020, at 10:31 AM, Matthias Seidel <matthias.seidel@hamburg.de> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jim,
> 
> Am 07.09.20 um 15:14 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> For 4.1.x we have always supported 10.7 as the min macOS version. Changing supported
versions via a patch release does not seem right. IMO, we pull the rug out from under people
when bumping patch revs.
> 
> That's one of the reasons why it was backed out of 4.1.6 and why I
> wanted you to have a look.
> 
> Maybe the patch works also with 10.7?
> 
> Regards,
> 
>    Matthias
> 
>> 
>>> On Sep 4, 2020, at 9:18 AM, Matthias Seidel <matthias.seidel@hamburg.de>
wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Jim, Don,
>>> 
>>> Am 28.08.20 um 15:17 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>> Let's commit and work after pushed.
>>> We should try
>>> 
>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127887
>>> 
>>> again for 4.1.8.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>>   Matthias
>>> 
>>>>> On Aug 27, 2020, at 2:02 PM, Don Lewis <truckman@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 27 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>> Am 27.08.20 um 19:32 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>>>> Hi Don,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Am 24.08.20 um 04:04 schrieb Don Lewis:
>>>>>>>> I've got a bunch of cherry picks that I'm planning to merge
into AOO418.
>>>>>>>> There are two categories:
>>>>>>>> * Fixes from the FreeBSD port that have been upstreamed to
the trunk
>>>>>>>>  and AOO42X branches, but I'm still carrying around in the
FreeBSD
>>>>>>>>  port of 4.1.7.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> * Updates of a bunch of the bundled dependencies.  These
have been
>>>>>>>>  updated in AOO42X and trunk for a while, but haven't been
merged to
>>>>>>>>  AOO418.  The FreeBSD port mostly usees the system versions
of these.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I'd like to revisit:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> commit 7a3beb322b74df1b6c96e03605837df34781c68f
>>>>>>>> Author: Matthias Seidel <mseidel@apache.org>
>>>>>>>> Date:   Thu Oct 11 16:53:51 2018 +0000
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>    Rollback to Rev. 1843088 due to build errors.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>    git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO416@18438571
13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I'm still using the patch for the FreeBSD port.  Without
it, a build
>>>>>>>> with --enable-odk will fail with Java 8 or newer.  I don't
see how it
>>>>>>>> would break the build since the changes are just to structured
comments
>>>>>>>> that are parsed to generate the documentation in the ODK.
 When this was
>>>>>>>> backed out, I thought the reason was that building with a
newer version
>>>>>>>> of the JDK would prevent runtime detection of older versions
of the JDK.
>>>>>>>> So far asa I know, that's not a problem with AOO42X and trunk,
which
>>>>>>>> have the changes.
>>>>>>> If I remember it right the Rollback included:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> - Issue 127887 - update bundled redland/raptor/rasqal
>>>>>>> - Issue 127875 - fix a loop that visits all objects on a page
so that
>>>>>>> all objects get visited
>>>>>>> - Issue 127874 - fix bad potential invalid subscript bug when
using
>>>>>>> Microsoft Uniscribe text layout API
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> We should commit all of the above again, one after the other.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Correcting myself: I had re-committed Issue 127874 and Issue 127875
to
>>>>>> 4.1.6 after the Rollback.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> So Issue 127887 could now be committed to 4.1.8.
>>>>>> We should discuss the change in configure.in regarding MacOS with
Jim.
>>>>> I'm working on a fairly large update to the bundled software.  I should
>>>>> be able to create a pull request in a day or so.  127887 will be
>>>>> included.  I'll test it on Linux and Windows.  I'll take a stab at the
>>>>> MacOS bits, but won't be able to test it.
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  Matthias
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> "Issue 127876 - unbreak ODK build with Java 8" should be double
>>>>>>> checked because of the known issue with Java 7 JRE.
>>>>> Since 127876 only changes comments in our Java code, it should not
>>>>> affect detection.  Without this change, is the Java 7 JRE detected if
we
>>>>> build with Java 8?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org>
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org <mailto:dev-help@openoffice.apache.org>
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org>
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org <mailto:dev-help@openoffice.apache.org>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message