rave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jasha Joachimsthal <ja...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Rave 0.18 Release Candidate
Date Wed, 05 Dec 2012 07:05:00 GMT
Unfortunately I'm unable to check this release, so no vote from me. Please
let's not make this bug a blocker for 0.18. Before the next release we
should put more effort in extending the integration tests.

On 5 December 2012 01:35, Ate Douma <ate@douma.nu> wrote:

> I tested the 0.18 release and all-in-all it works pretty fine.
> The performance on H2 still is an issue of course but not blocking
> (RAVE-838).
> Also, RAVE-845 seems to be fixed, deleting a user with friend associations
> now works.
> However I discovered a new, and IMO worse error RAVE-859: when I delete a
> user who has pages shared with, that action also deletes those shared pages
> which aren't 'owned' by this user. Rather destructive...
> I'm not sure we should qualify this as a release blocker, as we already
> canceled the previous release candidate, but *functionally* it certainly
> qualifies. I don't know if anyone (yet) is using this feature in an
> (almost) production environment, but if so then they should *not* upgrade
> to this 0.18 release candidate until this bug is fixed.
> Or, well, maybe previous releases also had this bug already (I haven't had
> time to check) in which case it doesn't really matter.
> WDYT: should we accept this as a known/recognized bug (and then highlight
> this in the release announcement) or qualify this as a release blocker?
> I'm holding off voting +1/-1 for now.
> Ate
> On 12/02/2012 05:34 AM, Raminderjeet Singh wrote:
>> Discussion thread for vote on 0.18 release candidate.
>> For more information on the release process, checkout -
>> http://www.apache.org/dev/**release.html<http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html>
>> Some of the things to check before voting are:
>> - can you run the demo binaries
>> - can you build the contents of source-release.zip and svn tag
>> - do all of the staged jars/zips contain the required LICENSE and NOTICE
>> files
>> - are all of the staged artifacts signed and the signature verifiable
>> - is the signing key in the project's KEYS file and on a public server

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message