rave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chris Geer <ch...@cxtsoftware.com>
Subject Re: Shindig Upgrade
Date Thu, 20 Dec 2012 18:46:13 GMT
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Matt Franklin <m.ben.franklin@gmail.com>wrote:

> On Thursday, December 20, 2012, Chris Geer wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Chris Geer <chris@cxtsoftware.com
> <javascript:;>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Matt Franklin <
> m.ben.franklin@gmail.com<javascript:;>
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Thursday, December 20, 2012, Chris Geer wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Has anyone evaluated the newer releases on shindig? I noticed they
> are
> > >> on
> > >> > 2.5-beta5 and we are still on 2.5-beta3. Any desire to try and
> upgrade
> > >> for
> > >> > the 0.19 release?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> I thought we were on beta4; but, we should definitely upgrade.
> > >>
> > >
> > > Ok, I'll try and get that change made this week.
> > >
> >
> > I just checked this in.
>
>
> We should also document the process for upgrading to a new version (digging
> overridden files, etc).
>

First draft in place.

>
>
> > We still get a lot of those ehCache sizeOf
> > warnings. Any idea if we can tweak something to reduce out object graph
> > sizes? I know we can increase the size that is allowed to avoid the
> warning
> > but I don't understand why we see that at all. Anyone understand how
> > Shindig is using ehcache?
> >
>
> I know you can tweak the sizes in shindig.properties.
>

I was more curious why we were seeing the warnings and if there is
something we can do to reduce the number of objects we have in memory.

>
>
> >
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> > Chris
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message