Hi,
We plan to add a more comprehensive local linear algebra package for MLlib
1.4. This local linear algebra package can then easily be extended to
BlockMatrix to support the same operations in a distributed fashion.
You may find the JIRA to track this here: SPARK6442
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK6442>
The design doc is here: http://goo.gl/sf5LCE
We would very much appreciate your feedback and input.
Best,
Burak
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Debasish Das <debasish.das83@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Yeah it will be better if we consolidate the development on one of
> them...either Breeze or mllib.BLAS...
>
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Ulanov, Alexander <
> alexander.ulanov@hp.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for quick response.
> >
> > I can use linealg.BLAS.gemm, and this means that I have to use MLlib
> > Matrix. The latter does not support some useful functionality needed for
> > optimization. For example, creation of Matrix given matrix size, array
> and
> > offset in this array. This means that I will need to create matrix in
> > Breeze and convert it to MLlib. Also, linalg.BLAS misses some useful BLAS
> > functions I need, that can be found in Breeze (and netlibjava). The same
> > concerns are applicable to MLlib Vector.
> >
> > Best regards, Alexander
> >
> > 19.03.2015, в 14:16, "Debasish Das" <debasish.das83@gmail.com>
> написал(а):
> >
> > I think for Breeze we are focused on dot and dgemv right now (along
> > with several other matrix vector style operations)...
> >
> > For dgemm it is tricky since you need to do add dgemm for both
> > DenseMatrix and CSCMatrix...and for CSCMatrix you need to get something
> > like SuiteSparse which is under lgpl...so we have to think more on it..
> >
> > For now can't you use dgemm directly from mllib.linalg.BLAS ? It's in
> > master...
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Ulanov, Alexander <
> > alexander.ulanov@hp.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Thank you! When do you expect to have gemm in Breeze and that version
> >> of Breeze to ship with MLlib?
> >>
> >> Also, could someone please elaborate on the linalg.BLAS and Matrix? Are
> >> they going to be developed further, should in long term all developers
> use
> >> them?
> >>
> >> Best regards, Alexander
> >>
> >> 18.03.2015, в 23:21, "Debasish Das" <debasish.das83@gmail.com>
> >> написал(а):
> >>
> >> dgemm dgemv and dot come to Breeze and Spark through netlibjava....
> >>
> >> Right now both in dot and dgemv Breeze does a extra memory allocate but
> >> we already found the issue and we are working on adding a common trait
> that
> >> will provide a sink operation (basically memory will be allocated by
> >> user)...adding more BLAS operators in breeze will also help in general
> as
> >> lot more operations are defined over there...
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Ulanov, Alexander <
> >> alexander.ulanov@hp.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Currently I am using Breeze within Spark MLlib for linear algebra. I
> >>> would like to reuse previously allocated matrices for storing the
> result of
> >>> matrices multiplication, i.e. I need to use "gemm" function
> C:=q*A*B+p*C,
> >>> which is missing in Breeze (Breeze automatically allocates a new
> matrix to
> >>> store the result of multiplication). Also, I would like to minimize
> gemm
> >>> calls that Breeze does. Should I use mllib.linalg.BLAS functions
> instead?
> >>> While it has gemm and axpy, it has rather limited number of
> operations. For
> >>> example, I need sum of the matrix by row or by columns, or applying a
> >>> function to all elements in a matrix. Also, MLlib Vector and Matrix
> >>> interfaces that linalg.BLAS operates seems to be rather undeveloped.
> Should
> >>> I use plain netlibjava instead (will it remain in MLlib in future
> >>> releases)?
> >>>
> >>> Best regards, Alexander
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
