spark-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Holden Karau <hol...@pigscanfly.ca>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Spark 2.1.0 (RC5)
Date Sun, 18 Dec 2016 20:04:35 GMT
+1 (non-binding) - checked Python artifacts with virtual env.

On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 11:42 AM Denny Lee <denny.g.lee@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 11:45 PM Liwei Lin <lwlin7@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Cheers,
> Liwei
>
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Yuming Wang <wgyumg@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I hope https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16252 can be fixed until
> release 2.1.0. It's a fix for broadcast cannot fit in memory.
>
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Joseph Bradley <joseph@databricks.com>
> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Herman van Hövell tot Westerflier <
> hvanhovell@databricks.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 12:14 AM, Xiao Li <gatorsmile@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Xiao Li
>
> 2016-12-16 12:19 GMT-08:00 Felix Cheung <felixcheung_m@hotmail.com>:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> For R we have a license field in the DESCRIPTION, and this is standard
> practice (and requirement) for R packages.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/R-exts.html#Licensing
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
> *From:* Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>
>
>
> *Sent:* Friday, December 16, 2016 9:57:15 AM
>
>
> *To:* Reynold Xin; dev@spark.apache.org
>
>
> *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] Apache Spark 2.1.0 (RC5)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> (If you have a template for these emails, maybe update it to use https
> links. They work for
>
> apache.org domains. After all we are asking people to verify the
> integrity of release artifacts, so it might as well be secure.)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> (Also the new archives use .tar.gz instead of .tgz like the others. No big
> deal, my OCD eye just noticed it.)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I don't see an Apache license / notice for the Pyspark or SparkR
> artifacts. It would be good practice to include this in a convenience
> binary. I'm not sure if it's strictly mandatory, but something to adjust in
> any event. I think that's all there is to
>
> do for SparkR. For Pyspark, which packages a bunch of dependencies, it
> does include the licenses (good) but I think it should include the NOTICE
> file.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This is the first time I recall getting 0 test failures off the bat!
>
>
> I'm using Java 8 / Ubuntu 16 and yarn/hive/hadoop-2.7 profiles.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I think I'd +1 this therefore unless someone knows that the license issue
> above is real and a blocker.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 5:17 AM Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
> 2.1.0. The vote is open until Sun, December 18, 2016 at 21:30 PT and passes
> if a majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 2.1.0
>
>
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To learn more about Apache Spark, please see
>
> http://spark.apache.org/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The tag to be voted on is v2.1.0-rc5
> (cd0a08361e2526519e7c131c42116bf56fa62c76)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> List of JIRA tickets resolved are:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20SPARK%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.1.0
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>
>
> http://home.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-releases/spark-2.1.0-rc5-bin/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>
>
> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/pwendell.asc
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The staging repository for this release can be found at:
>
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachespark-1223/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at:
>
>
> http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-releases/spark-2.1.0-rc5-docs/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *FAQ*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *How can I help test this release?*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> If you are a Spark user, you can help us test this release by taking an
> existing Spark workload and running on this release candidate, then
> reporting any regressions.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *What should happen to JIRA tickets still targeting 2.1.0?*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Committers should look at those and triage. Extremely important bug fixes,
> documentation, and API tweaks that impact compatibility should be worked on
> immediately. Everything else please retarget to 2.1.1 or 2.2.0.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *What happened to RC3/RC5?*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> They had issues withe release packaging and as a result were skipped.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Herman van Hövell
>
> Software Engineer
>
> Databricks Inc.
>
> hvanhovell@databricks.com
>
> +31 6 420 590 27
>
> databricks.com
>
> [image: http://databricks.com] <http://databricks.com/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Joseph Bradley
>
> Software Engineer - Machine Learning
>
> Databricks, Inc.
>
> [image: http://databricks.com] <http://databricks.com/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Mime
View raw message