spark-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Hamstra <>
Subject Re: Spark Improvement Proposals
Date Thu, 09 Mar 2017 18:17:47 GMT
-0 on voting on whether we need a vote.

On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:00 AM, Reynold Xin <> wrote:

> I'm fine without a vote. (are we voting on wether we need a vote?)
> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Sean Owen <> wrote:
>> I think a VOTE is over-thinking it, and is rarely used, but, can't hurt.
>> Nah, anyone can call a vote. This really isn't that formal. We just want to
>> declare and document consensus.
>> I think SPIP is just a remix of existing process anyway, and don't think
>> it will actually do much anyway, which is why I am sanguine about the whole
>> thing.
>> To bring this to a conclusion, I will just put the contents of the doc in
>> an email tomorrow for a VOTE. Raise any objections now.
>> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 3:39 PM Cody Koeninger <> wrote:
>>> I started this idea as a fork with a merge-able change to docs.
>>> Reynold moved it to his google doc, and has suggested during this
>>> email thread that a vote should occur.
>>> If a vote needs to occur, I can't see anything on
>>> suggesting that I can call
>>> for a vote, which is why I'm asking PMC members to do it since they're
>>> the ones who would vote anyway.
>>> Now Sean is saying this is a code/doc change that can just be reviewed
>>> and merged as usual...which is what I tried to do to begin with.
>>> The fact that you haven't agreed on a process to agree on your process
>>> is, I think, an indication that the process really does need
>>> improvement ;)

View raw message