So, it looks like slave was already replaced in the docs. Waiting for a definition on the replacement(s) for master so I can create a PR for the docs only.

On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 8:30 AM jpaulorio <> wrote:
What about updating the documentation as well? Does it depend on the codebase
changes or can we treat it as a separate issue? I volunteer to update both
Master and Slave terms when there's an agreement on what should be used as
replacement. Since  [SPARK-32004]
<>   was already resolved,
can I start replacing slave with worker?

Sent from:

To unsubscribe e-mail: