spark-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Terry Kim (Jira)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (SPARK-30283) V2 Command logical plan should use UnresolvedV2Relation for a table
Date Wed, 18 Dec 2019 06:01:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16998829#comment-16998829
] 

Terry Kim commented on SPARK-30283:
-----------------------------------

PR will be submitted once https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30282 is resolved.

> V2 Command logical plan should use UnresolvedV2Relation for a table
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-30283
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30283
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: SQL
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0
>            Reporter: Terry Kim
>            Priority: Major
>
> For the following v2 commands, multi-part names are directly passed to the command without
looking up temp views, thus they are always resolved to tables:
>  * DROP TABLE
>  * REFRESH TABLE
>  * RENAME TABLE
>  * REPLACE TABLE
> They should be updated to have UnresolvedV2Relation such that temp views are looked
up first in Analyzer.ResolveTables.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@spark.apache.org


Mime
View raw message