spark-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
Subject Re: RDD.combineBy without intermediate (k,v) pair allocation
Date Thu, 29 Jan 2015 19:01:43 GMT
Oh, I’m sorry, I meant `aggregateByKey`.


On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 7:58 PM, Mohit Jaggi <> wrote:

> Francois,
> RDD.aggregate() does not support aggregation by key. But, indeed, that is the kind of
implementation I am looking for, one that does not allocate intermediate space for storing
(K,V) pairs. When working with large datasets this type of intermediate memory allocation
wrecks havoc with garbage collection, not to mention unnecessarily increases the working memory
requirement of the program.
> I wonder if someone has already noticed this and there is an effort underway to optimize
this. If not, I will take a shot at adding this functionality.
> Mohit.
>> On Jan 27, 2015, at 1:52 PM, wrote:
>> Have you looked at the `aggregate` function in the RDD API ? 
>> If your way of extracting the “key” (identifier) and “value” (payload) parts
of the RDD elements is uniform (a function), it’s unclear to me how this would be more efficient
that extracting key and value and then using combine, however.
>> —
>> FG
>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:17 PM, Mohit Jaggi < <>>
>> Hi All, 
>> I have a use case where I have an RDD (not a k,v pair) where I want to do a combineByKey()
operation. I can do that by creating an intermediate RDD of k,v pairs and using PairRDDFunctions.combineByKey().
However, I believe it will be more efficient if I can avoid this intermediate RDD. Is there
a way I can do this by passing in a function that extracts the key, like in RDD.groupBy()?
[oops, RDD.groupBy seems to create the intermediate RDD anyway, maybe a better implementation
is possible for that too?] 
>> If not, is it worth adding to the Spark API? 
>> Mohit. 
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
>> For additional commands, e-mail: 
View raw message