spark-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jörn Franke <>
Subject Re: Is it worth storing in ORC for one time read. And can be replace hive with HBase
Date Thu, 06 Aug 2015 13:07:42 GMT
Yes you should use orc it is much faster and more compact. Additionally you
can apply compression (snappy) to increase performance. Your data
processing pipeline seems to be not.very optimized. You should use the
newest hive version enabling storage indexes and bloom filters on
appropriate columns. Ideally you should insert the data sorted
appropriately. Partitioning and setting the execution engine to tez is also

Hbase with phoenix should currently only be used if you do few joins, not
very complex queries and not many full table scans.

Le jeu. 6 août 2015 à 14:54, venkatesh b <> a
écrit :

> Hi, here I got two things to know.
> In our project we use hive.
> We daily get new data. We need to process this new data only once. And
> send this processed data to RDBMS. Here in processing we majorly use many
> complex queries with joins with where condition and grouping functions.
> There are many intermediate tables generated around 50 while
> processing. Till now we use text format as storage. We came across ORC file
> format. I would like to know that since it is one Time querying the table
> is it worth of storing as ORC format.
> I came to know about HBase, which is faster.
> Can I replace hive with HBase for processing of data daily faster.
> Currently it is taking 15hrs daily with hive.
> Please inform me if any other information is needed.
> Thanks & regards
> Venkatesh

View raw message