Thanks Alessandro and Christoph.  I appreciate the feedback, but I'm still having issues determining how to actually accomplish this with the API.

Can anyone point me to an example in code showing how to accomplish this?

On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 2:37 AM, Alessandro Solimando wrote:
Hi Matt,
similarly to what Christoph does, I first derive the cluster id for the elements of my original dataset, and then I use a classification algorithm (cluster ids being the classes here).

For this method to be useful you need a "human-readable" model, tree-based models are generally a good choice (e.g., Decision Tree).

However, since those models tend to be verbose, you still need a way to summarize them to facilitate readability (there must be some literature on this topic, although I have no pointers to provide).



On 1 March 2018 at 21:59, Christoph Brücke <> wrote:
Hi Matt,

I see. You could use the trained model to predict the cluster id for each training point. Now you should be able to create a dataset with your original input data and the associated cluster id for each data point in the input data. Now you can group this dataset by cluster id and aggregate over the original 5 features. E.g., get the mean for numerical data or the value that occurs the most for categorical data.

The exact aggregation is use-case dependent.

I hope this helps,

Am 01.03.2018 21:40 schrieb "Matt Hicks" <>:
Thanks for the response Christoph.

I'm converting large amounts of data into clustering training and I'm just having a hard time reasoning about reversing the clusters (in code) back to the original format to properly understand the dominant values in each cluster.

For example, if I have five fields of data and I've trained ten clusters of data I'd like to output the five fields of data as represented by each of the ten clusters.

On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 2:36 PM, Christoph Brücke wrote:
Hi matt,

the cluster are defined by there centroids / cluster centers. All the points belonging to a certain cluster are closer to its than to the centroids of any other cluster.

What I typically do is to convert the cluster centers back to the original input format or of that is not possible use the point nearest to the cluster center and use this as a representation of the whole cluster.

Can you be a little bit more specific about your use-case?


Am 01.03.2018 20:53 schrieb "Matt Hicks" <>:
I'm using K Means clustering for a project right now, and it's working very well.  However, I'd like to determine from the clusters what information distinctions define each cluster so I can explain the "reasons" data fits into a specific cluster.

Is there a proper way to do this in Spark ML?