spark-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nicolas Paris <nicolas.pa...@riseup.net>
Subject Re: graphx vs graphframes
Date Thu, 17 Oct 2019 21:03:16 GMT
Hi Alastair

Cypher support looks like promising and the dev list thread discussion
is interesting. 
thanks for your feedback. 

On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 09:19:28AM +0100, Alastair Green wrote:
> Hi Nicolas, 
> 
> I was following the current thread on the dev channel about Spark
> Graph, including Cypher support, 
> 
> http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/
> Add-spark-dependency-on-on-org-opencypher-okapi-shade-okapi-td28118.html
> 
> and I remembered your post.
> 
> Actually, GraphX and GraphFrames are both not being developed actively, so far
> as I can tell. 
> 
> The only activity on GraphX in the last two years was a fix for Scala 2.13
> functionality: to quote the PR 
> 
> 
>     ### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
> 
>     No behavior change at all.
> 
> The only activity on GraphFrames since the addition of Pregel support in Scala
> back in December 2018, has been build/test improvements and recent builds
> against 2.4 and 3.0 snapshots. I’m not sure there was a lot of functional
> change before that either. 
> 
> The efforts to provide graph processing in Spark with the more full-featured
> Cypher query language that you can see in the proposed 3.0 changes discussed in
> the dev list, and the related openCypher/morpheus project (which among many
> other things allows you to cast a Morpheus graph into a GraphX graph) and
> extends the proposed 3.0 changes in a compatible way, are active. 
> 
> Yrs, 
> 
> Alastair
> 
> 
> Alastair Green
> 
> Query Languages Standards and Research
> 
> 
> Neo4j UK Ltd
> 
> Union House
> 182-194 Union Street
> London, SE1 0LH
> 
> 
> +44 795 841 2107
> 
> 
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 21:17, Nicolas Paris <nicolas.paris@riseup.net> wrote:
> 
>     hi all
> 
>     graphframes was intended to replace graphx.
> 
>     however the former looks not maintained anymore while the latter is
>     still active.
> 
>     any thought ?
>     --
>     nicolas
> 
>     ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>     To unsubscribe e-mail: user-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
> 
> 

-- 
nicolas

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe e-mail: user-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org


Mime
View raw message