spot-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Vartika Singh <vsi...@cloudera.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] New development branch for ingestion component
Date Tue, 21 Nov 2017 20:41:44 GMT
+1

On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Cesar Berho <cesar@apache.org> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 12:26 PM, solrac901@apache.org <
> solrac901@apache.org
> > wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> >
> > 2017-11-21 5:12 GMT-06:00 Nate Smith <nathanael@apache.org>:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I’d like to call a vote in regards to the following:
> > >
> > > Creation of an Ingest redesign branch (name to be determined) and
> linkage
> > > of this branch to a Jira epic.
> > >
> > > These are the proposed requirements:
> > >
> > >   1. Extendible to any source.
> > >   2. NRT latency between ingestion and output to the HDFS/persistent
> > store.
> > >   3. Maintain the integrity of the ODM module in order to facilitate
> > >   seamless integration with applications.
> > >
> > > Please see the design spec for more details prior to voting:
> > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yYaD50gp2HN9RHYaUG8ASDfh3f__
> > > GyB1Msu2LUofIU4/edit#
> > >
> > > I will leave the vote open for 3 days,
> > >
> > > - Nathanael
> > >
> > > On Nov 17, 2017, at 2:28 PM, Mubashir Kazia <mkazia@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 for breaking down into tasks.
> > >
> > > Let's resolve the comments in the doc and put it up for vote. Looks
> good
> > to
> > > me otherwise.
> > >
> > > Thanks Vartika for working on this.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 10:36 PM, Michael Ridley <mridley@cloudera.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > I just realized that in my re-writing and editing of the last email I
> > took
> > > out the part where I said that I thought it looks good.  But I do think
> > it
> > > looks good :-)
> > >
> > > Michael
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 10:35 PM, Michael Ridley <mridley@cloudera.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Vartika-
> > >
> > > Thanks for the reminder about the ingestion design document.  Suggest
> we
> > > open a JIRA (unless one has already been opened and I missed it) with
> the
> > > specific tasks broken down (create an Epic if necessary) and attach a
> PDF
> > > version of the architecture document.  Would also be great to get this
> > > document into the Spot repo.
> > >
> > > Do we need a separate upstream branch?  I don't think there has been
> much
> > > development process discussion here but I would expect the work to be
> in
> > > the main dev branch after the patches/PRs are accepted and the JIRAs
> are
> > > resolved.
> > >
> > > Michael
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 11:31 PM, Vartika Singh <vsingh@cloudera.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > The following document has been out for discussion for a while:
> > >
> > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yYaD50gp2HN9RHYaUG8ASDfh3f__
> > > GyB1Msu2LUofIU4/edit#heading=h.ptz51qlqt0t
> > >
> > > I would like to start a new branch for ingestion component. A
> > >
> > > Again, the idea of ingestion component is the following:
> > >
> > >   1. Extendible to any source.
> > >   2. NRT latency between ingestion and output to the HDFS/persistent
> > > store.
> > >   3. Maintain the integrity of the ODM module in order to facilitate
> > >   seamless integration with applications.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> > >
> > > Vartika Singh
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Michael Ridley <mridley@cloudera.com>
> > > office: (650) 352-1337
> > > mobile: (571) 438-2420
> > > Senior Solutions Architect
> > > Cloudera
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Michael Ridley <mridley@cloudera.com>
> > > office: (650) 352-1337
> > > mobile: (571) 438-2420
> > > Senior Solutions Architect
> > > Cloudera
> > >
> >
>



-- 
Vartika Singh
Cloudera

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message