struts-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Wendy Smoak (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (SB-52) Reconsider removal of Tiles controllers
Date Fri, 06 Oct 2006 03:51:16 GMT
    [ http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SB-52?page=comments#action_38333 ] 
            
Wendy Smoak commented on SB-52:
-------------------------------


http://www.nabble.com/-tiles2--GetTag-vs.-InsertTag-t2381916.html#a6660408

http://www.nabble.com/-tiles2--GetTag-vs.-InsertTag-t2381916.html#a6662190

> Reconsider removal of Tiles controllers
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SB-52
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SB-52
>             Project: Sandbox
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Tiles
>            Reporter: Wendy Smoak
>             Fix For: 2.0
>
>
> In http://www.nabble.com/-tiles2--GetTag-vs.-InsertTag-t2381916.html#a6658837
> Cedric writes:
>  * The controllers were added to allows stand alone use of tiles to
>      be able to do some kind of computation associated to the tiles.
>      When used with Struts, there is a redundancy (with the use of
>      actions), but when used alone, the controller mechanism is very
>      useful to separate view rendering from controller business
> This relates to the removal of the controllerURL and controllerClass attributes.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/struts/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Mime
View raw message