tajo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik.c...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] 0.9.1 release
Date Thu, 18 Dec 2014 04:14:55 GMT
I'm happy that you guys consent to go 0.10. Let's go ahead.

On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Jinho Kim <jhkim@apache.org> wrote:
>  +1 for 0.10.0
>
> -Jinho
> Best regards
>
> 2014-12-18 2:04 GMT+09:00 Hyoungjun Kim <hjkim@apache.org>:
>>
>> Hi folks,
>> I think that current change is major because many interfaces(TajoClient,
>> StorageManager) are changed.
>>
>> +1 for 0.10.0
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Hyoungjun
>>
>> 2014-12-18 1:53 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org>:
>> >
>> > In my view, we can easily find out two digit version policy (e.g.,
>> > 0.10) in famous open source projects like gnome, scala language,
>> > ubuntu and so on. Therefore, in my opinion, two digit version is not
>> > matter.
>> >
>> > So, I think that we only need to decide whether is a major or minor
>> > change. If it is major, we can use 0.10. Otherwise, we can use 0.9.1.
>> > 1.0 would be not candidate.
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> > Hyunsik
>> >
>> > On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Jaehwa Jung <blrunner@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > > Hi folks,
>> > >
>> > > +1 for 0.10.0
>> > >
>> > > I think that users will be familiar with the version because of hive
>> and
>> > > pig.
>> > >
>> > > Cheers
>> > > Jaehwa
>> > > 2014. 12. 15. 오후 6:45에 "Hyoungjun Kim" <hjkim@apache.org>님이
작성:
>> > >
>> > >> Hi,
>> > >>
>> > >> I think that Tajo is not ready for 1.0.0 and 0.10.0 version is
>> unusual
>> > >> version.
>> > >> So, I give +1 for 0.9.1
>> > >>
>> > >> Best Regards,
>> > >> Hyoungjun
>> > >>
>> > >> 2014-12-15 18:40 GMT+09:00 Jihoon Son <jihoonson@apache.org>:
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Hyunsik,
>> > >> > I missed my vote.
>> > >> > I think that Tajo can provide product-level functions, and there
are
>> > many
>> > >> > real use cases.
>> > >> > So, I would like to give +1 for 1.0.0 rather than 0.10.0.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Sincerely,
>> > >> > Jihoon
>> > >> >
>> > >> > 2014-12-15 16:41 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org>:
>> > >> >
>> > >> > > Hi Jihoon,
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > I'm happy to hear your suggestion. Yes, you are right. The
current
>> > >> > > master branch includes lots of significant changes. Actually,
I
>> > didn't
>> > >> > > expect that when I make 0.9.1 roadmap in Jira. I agree with
your
>> > >> > > suggestion.
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > BTW, we need to hear other guy's thinkings. Could you a make
a
>> vote
>> > >> > > for 0.9.1 vs 0.10?
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > Best regards,
>> > >> > > Hyunsik
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Jihoon Son <jihoonson@apache.org
>> >
>> > >> > wrote:
>> > >> > > > Hi folks,
>> > >> > > > I agree on that this is the right time to release a
new version
>> of
>> > >> > Tajo.
>> > >> > > > However, on the version number, I have another idea.
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > I think that this release involves large changes from
various
>> > >> > > perspectives,
>> > >> > > > such as client API, HBase integration, and so on.
>> > >> > > > So, I'd like to suggest to make a major release rather
than
>> 0.9.1.
>> > >> > > > What do you think about it?
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > If you agree, we will have two choices of Hadoop-style
>> versioning
>> > >> > > (0.10.0)
>> > >> > > > and traditional versioning(1.0.0).
>> > >> > > > I hope to hear any opinions from you.
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > Sincerely,
>> > >> > > > Jihoon
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > 2014-12-13 15:14 GMT+09:00 Jihun Kang <ykrips@gmail.com>:
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >> Hello hyunsik,
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >> Any critical issues are not found on 0.9.1, and
it would be
>> > great if
>> > >> > we
>> > >> > > >> release next version.
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >> Thanks and best regards.
>> > >> > > >> Jihun Kang
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >> 2014-12-12 16:51 GMT+09:00 Jinho Kim <jhkim@apache.org>:
>> > >> > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> >  +1 I agree
>> > >> > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> > -Jinho
>> > >> > > >> > Best regards
>> > >> > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> > 2014-12-12 10:55 GMT+09:00 Jaehwa Jung <blrunner@apache.org
>> >:
>> > >> > > >> > >
>> > >> > > >> > > Hi Hyunsik,
>> > >> > > >> > >
>> > >> > > >> > > +1
>> > >> > > >> > >
>> > >> > > >> > > The time has come for 0.9.1 release.
>> > >> > > >> > > For reference, I'll fix an issue which
assigned to me this
>> > week.
>> > >> > > >> > >
>> > >> > > >> > > Cheer,
>> > >> > > >> > > Jaehwa
>> > >> > > >> > >
>> > >> > > >> > >
>> > >> > > >> > >
>> > >> > > >> > >
>> > >> > > >> > > 2014-12-12 1:00 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi
<hyunsik@apache.org
>> >:
>> > >> > > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >> > > > Hi folks,
>> > >> > > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >> > > > There are not many issues scheduled
to 0.9.1.
>> > >> > > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >> > >
>> > >> > > >> >
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-940?jql=project%20%3D%20TAJO%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.1%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>> > >> > > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >> > > > It's right time to discuss 0.9.1
release. I think that
>> > there
>> > >> are
>> > >> > > few
>> > >> > > >> > > > important issues in 0.9.1. Others
look trivial, and we
>> can
>> > >> > > reschedule
>> > >> > > >> > > > them to 0.9.2 release.
>> > >> > > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >> > > > If you guys agree with my proposal,
I'll start the
>> release
>> > >> work
>> > >> > > soon.
>> > >> > > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >> > > > Best regards,
>> > >> > > >> > > > Hyunsik
>> > >> > > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >> > >
>> > >> > > >> >
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>>

Mime
View raw message