tomcat-taglibs-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rahul P Akolkar <>
Subject Re: question about tags and includes
Date Tue, 03 May 2005 14:21:57 GMT
On 5/3/05, luca passani <> wrote:
> OK, I buy it that this is an explanation of why includes of non 
well-formed tags don't work.
> Questions:
> - isn't this a pointless limitation? are there real technical reasons 
for this?
> - this should be more prominently documented in the JSP specs, IMO. I 
must have reads
>  descriptions like the one you posted tens of times and I never 
interpreted that
>  to mean that included JSP files need be well-formed XML

Spec related questions/comments will be best addressed in the appropriate 
forum i.e. jsp-spec-public [ ]

I think of includes as independent compilation (if needed) units. Custom 
tags are more concise, better maintained and nest, validate more easily 
compared to includes for the kind of end effect you're trying to achieve 
i.e. instead of:

<%@ include file="" %>
<%@ include file="" %>

I'd author a wrapper tag like so:


where wrapper.tag looks like:

<%-- taglib, attr, page decls, JSP elements, template text etc. as needed 
  <%-- you could do more with jsp:doBody --%>
  <jsp:doBody />
<%-- remaining JSP elements, template text etc. --%>

And, this implies JSP 2.0 ;-) Let me know how it goes.


  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message