tomee-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Blevins <>
Subject Re: Why is the container managing the autocommit state in BMTs?
Date Thu, 07 Dec 2006 00:02:25 GMT

On Dec 5, 2006, at 11:16 PM, Per Newgro wrote:

> Hi *,
> afaik BMT means bean managed transactions.
> I use SFSB defined in the following way:
>   <session>
>     <ejb-name>ExportDatabaseUC</ejb-name>
>     <home>my.common.ejb.UseCaseHome</home>
>     <remote>my.common.ejb.UseCaseRemote</remote>
>     <ejb-class>my.misc.backup.ejb.ExportDatabaseUcEJB</ejb-class>
>     <session-type>Stateful</session-type>
>     <transaction-type>Bean</transaction-type>
>     <resource-ref>
>       <res-ref-name>APPLDB</res-ref-name>
>       <res-type>javax.sql.DataSource</res-type>
>       <res-auth>Container</res-auth>
>     </resource-ref>
>     <resource-ref>
>       <res-ref-name>APPLDBnoTx</res-ref-name>
>       <res-type>javax.sql.DataSource</res-type>
>       <res-auth>Container</res-auth>
>     </resource-ref>
>   </session>
> If i get a connection from the APPLDBnoTx i try to set the  
> autoCommit flag to
> false. But then i get a SQLException from openejbs JdbcConnection  
> "The commit
> state is managed by container" (not the exact words). But this  
> confuses me a
> little because i use BMT. It would realy be great if someone could  
> explain
> this to me (maybe i'm completely wrong).

Hi Per,

What we lack is the ability for you to turn this off/on on a per  
Connector basis.  It wouldn't matter whether the bean is BMT vs CMT  
as the real designation is on the DataSource which could be passed  
around to any other bean BMT or CMT.  I.e. the connection is setup  
either as local transactions only or JTA transactions -- a BMT could  
use either but the pooling rules are different for each.

We can definitely add this.  Couple questions, would you consider  
trying out OpenEJB 3 (it's java5 only) and how soon do you need this?


View raw message