trafodion-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Carol Pearson <carol.pearson...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: SQL Reference Manuals updates
Date Thu, 15 Sep 2016 18:45:18 GMT
Hi,

Release date is good enough, in my opinion. If someone is interested
particulars, then we have that history in git, though that's
developer-level function, not user-level.

-Carol P.


---------------------------------------------------------------
Email:    carol.pearson234@gmail.com
Twitter:  @CarolP222
---------------------------------------------------------------

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Steve Varnau <steve.varnau@esgyn.com>
wrote:

> I would have thought that the version of the documents (2.1) is good to
> have, and the release info (release dates) should be on the web site,
> rather
> than in the content of each document.
>
> The doc page (http://trafodion.incubator.apache.org/documentation.html)
> indicates that 2.0 is released, and the latest (in development) section
> points to the 2.1 docs.
>
> The release manager task list
> (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TRAFODION/
> Create+Release#CreateRelease-UpdateProjectWebSite)
> includes updating release info web page:
> http://trafodion.incubator.apache.org/download.html
>
> But not content of the docs.
>
> --Steve
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dave Birdsall [mailto:dave.birdsall@esgyn.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 11:00 AM
> > To: dev@trafodion.incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: SQL Reference Manuals updates
> >
> > Hi Carol,
> >
> > I'm wondering if the revision date should be the date of the release? If
> > so,
> > the release manager should be the one to update it.
> >
> > For the moment, I've written "TBD" here.
> >
> > Dave
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Carol Pearson [mailto:carol.pearson234@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 10:58 AM
> > To: dev@trafodion.incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: SQL Reference Manuals updates
> >
> > Hi Dave
> >
> > It seems like the "update the revision history" step should be part of
> the
> > release manager checklist that Roberta and Steve put together?  Nobody
> > knows
> > if s/he is the last person to update it....
> >
> > The alternative is every update is presumed to be the last, so each
> person
> > updates it as part of the change..
> >
> > -Carol P.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------
> > Email:    carol.pearson234@gmail.com
> > Twitter:  @CarolP222
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Dave Birdsall <dave.birdsall@esgyn.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I’m about to add documentation to the SQL Reference Manual for the
> > > incremental UPDATE STATISTICS (IUS) feature for Trafodion 2.1.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I’m guessing I’m the first person to do so for this release.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > One thing I notice is that the Revision History doesn’t have an entry
> > > for 2.1. I propose to add one, with a notation that this is a work in
> > > progress.
> > > The last person to update before the release should remove that note
> > > and set the date of the release.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Section 1.2 New and Changed Information appears to have stuff for the
> > > previous release (2.0, 2.0.1). I propose to remove all of this. But
> > > will add an entry for incremental update statistics.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Does this sound right to you?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Are there other general sections of this kind that need updating for
> > > the next release?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Dave
> > >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message