uima-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Thilo Goetz (JIRA)" <uima-...@incubator.apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (UIMA-1085) Fix Sandbox NOTICE files
Date Fri, 05 Jun 2009 09:04:07 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1085?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12716543#action_12716543

Thilo Goetz commented on UIMA-1085:

The latest wisdom on NOTICE files is here: http://apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice

> Fix Sandbox NOTICE files
> ------------------------
>                 Key: UIMA-1085
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1085
>             Project: UIMA
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Sandbox
>    Affects Versions: 2.2.2S
>            Reporter: Thilo Goetz
>            Assignee: Thilo Goetz
>             Fix For: 2.3S
> The sandbox notice files currently all look like this:
> Apache UIMA sandbox -- SimpleServer component
> Copyright 2008 The Apache Software Foundation
> This Apache UIMA software component includes code that was developed at
> The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
> This software is based on the UIMA Apache project (http://incubator.apache.org/uima).
> Licensed under the Apache License 2.0 (see http://incubator.apache.org/uima/license.html).
> The second paragraph seems obviously redundant.  Not sure what the third one is
> supposed to convey.  From recent discussions on legal-discuss, we have the
> simple rule the the NOTICE files should only contain required attributions.  Neither
> the second nor the third paragraph qualifies.  If I don't hear any disagreement, I'll
> fix this.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message