uima-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marshall Schor <...@schor.com>
Subject Re: Images in the tools docbook
Date Mon, 11 Oct 2010 19:08:00 GMT

This is something I'm not familiar with.

I ran maven in debug mode on a docbook build to check that the extensions Jar
was included, and found that it appears to be.  This is also evidenced by the
message Failed to load image..., which comes from that jar.

It appears that the relative path for the image files are not being resolved
correctly by this extension.

Googling around, I found in
some information which would seem to indicate that the main use of these
references is correct.  I'm guessing, however, that the extensions processor has
a bug in that it doesn't take advantage of the relative base to resolve relative


On 10/11/2010 12:38 PM, Jörn Kottmann wrote:
>  On 10/11/10 5:36 PM, Jörn Kottmann wrote:
>> One reason the scale parameter is behaving so differently
>> between pdf and html, might be that the html version
>> does not know about the intrinsic image size.
>> Marshall, do we use the graphic size extension?
>> http://www.sagehill.net/docbookxsl/ImageSizing.html#ImageSizeExt 
> I tried to enable it with the following params:
> grapicsizeExtension set to 1
> useExtensions set to 1
> Now it complains that it cannot load the image
> files:
> ...
> Failed to load image: images/tools/tools.cde/image002.jpg
> Failed to load image: images/tools/tools.cde/image004.jpg
> ...
> Not sure what am I missing.
> Here is a list of available parameters:
> http://docbkx-tools.sourceforge.net/docbkx-maven-plugin/generate-html-mojo.html#graphicsizeExtension
> Jörn

View raw message