uima-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Thilo Götz <twgo...@gmx.de>
Subject Re: reducing the number of "releases" of build tooling
Date Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:29:40 GMT


On 10/26/2010 17:27, Thilo Götz wrote:
> On 10/26/2010 17:14, Marshall Schor wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/26/2010 8:02 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Marshall Schor <msa@schor.com> wrote:
>>>> So, well, this isn't quite correct.  Things placed here get copied into the
top
>>>> of the top project, not the top level of the archive.
>>> Couldn't the top project simply be at the top level? Then this
>>> wouldn't be a problem. Convention over configuration, as they say.
>>>
>>
>> Good point. 
>>
>> We're currently using a "flat hierarchy" organization for our multi-module
>> project, due to our Eclipse IDE legacy. 
>>
>> Archive
>>     top-dir-of-archive
>>         top-project
>>           README
>>           LICENSE
>>           NOTICE
>>           RELEASE_NOTES etc.
>>         other project1
>>         other project2
>>
>> I was trying for:
>>
>> Archive
>>    top-dir-of-archive
>>       top-project
>>       other project1
>>       other project2
>>       README
>>       LICENSE
>>       NOTICE
>>       RELEASE_NOTES etc.
>>
>> I agree that we could restructure to eliminate the top-dir-of-archive, and
>> restructure things to have the top-project be that directory.  That might break
>> some Eclipse things related to multi-module projects, so would need to be tried
>> out and tested.
> 
> Would it be a problem if the README etc. don't show up
> in Eclipse?  You don't need more than a text editor for
> those, and you can check in a couple of files from the
> command line. (Or maybe I'm misunderstood)

Strike the 'm

> 
> --Thilo
> 
>>
>> -Marshall
>>
>>> Jukka Zitting
>>>
>>>

Mime
View raw message