uima-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jaroslaw Cwiklik <uim...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-AS 2.9.0 RC1
Date Tue, 22 Nov 2016 21:50:26 GMT
I did find a "small" bug in the code that logs a message when versions
don't match.
Its only effecting logging in this particular case where I chose v 3.0.0 as
the next
version for UIMA-AS.

I think the RC1 should not be taken down for this reason. In RC1 both uimaj
and
uima-as are at 2.9.0 and auto generated code (UimaVersion & UimaAsVersion)
are
correct.

Ultimately its up to you testers to decide if this is critical bug
deserving -1.


Jerry

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Marshall Schor <msa@schor.com> wrote:

> Ah - OK.  So you're saying, this RC is (possibly) good, and we should go
> ahead
> and test it, etc., and you'll fix the "next" release RC later, right?
>
> -Marshall
>
>
> On 11/22/2016 3:57 PM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik wrote:
> > Marshall, this is caused by me choosing next version to be 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT
> > when doing
> >
> > mvn release:prepare -DautoVersionSubmodules
> >
> > The UIMA-AS code does this check:
> >
> >       if (UimaAsVersion.getMajorVersion() !=
> UimaVersion.getMajorVersion())
> > {
> >
> > I will choose 2.9.1 as the next version when doing RC2 :)
> >
> > Jerry
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Marshall Schor <msa@schor.com> wrote:
> >
> >> hmmm, the latest Jenkins build is showing 4 test failures?
> >>
> >> -Marshall
> >>
> >>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message