xmlgraphics-batik-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Randall Parker" <randa...@nls.net>
Subject Re: HP and their plans for Batik
Date Mon, 01 Oct 2001 19:54:54 GMT

Correct me if I'm wrong: One or more of the patent holders who claim thart SVG 
uses patents could demand that all software that does stuff with SVG could 
demand a royalty payment for the use of Batik. 

This is the issue: Will the patent claims made by the vendors at this page:
 who have "RAND" (Reasonable and non-discriminatory terms) in their License 
Summary column demand patent payments from the Batik project developers 
and/or users?

What have Apple, IBM, Eastman Kodak, and Quark said on this issue? Any idea?

On Mon, 01 Oct 2001 10:30:43 +0200, Vincent Hardy wrote:

>   You raise issues with the patent situation in
>   the W3C with regards to SVG, and this debate is relevant 
>   for Batik, but I think it is important to make the 
>   distinction between Batik and SVG: they are two different things.
>   When raising important issues, I think it is key to be 
>   careful before putting negative tags on projects (for example,
>   talking about Batik "proprietary standards" is both inaccurate and
>   negative). 

To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-users-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: batik-users-help@xml.apache.org

View raw message