xmlgraphics-batik-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Thomas DeWeese <Thomas.DeWe...@Kodak.com>
Subject Re: Why does Squiggle complain about javascript?
Date Fri, 11 Jul 2003 23:54:19 GMT
Jim Ley wrote:

>"Vincent Hardy" <vincent.hardy@sun.com> wrote in message
>news:3F0D200B.1@sun.com...
>  
>
>>The type should be "text/ecmascript" not "text/javascript".
>>    
>>
>Since Batik has a JavaScript interpreter (not an ECMAScript one, although
>the non-compliances are minimal...) could it not also respond to a made up
>javascript mime-type just as it responds to a made up ECMAScript one.
>  
>
Hi Jim,

    Sure but the SVG specification doesn't require it :)
    I'm not sure why you would _want_ to introduce new 'equivilent' 
script types.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-users-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: batik-users-help@xml.apache.org


Mime
View raw message