xmlgraphics-fop-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mehdi Houshmand <med1...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: post 1.1 config changes
Date Thu, 08 Nov 2012 09:56:46 GMT
Hi Jason,

I don't think anyone has, or if they have, they haven't published it to the
community.

Hope that helps,

Mehdi


On 8 November 2012 09:53, Jason Harrop <jharrop@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Mehdi
>
> Thanks for your reply.  I'm happy I can write configuration code for
> current SVN head.  But my question is whether anyone has produced/shared
> configuration code which works with both current SVN head, and FOP 1.1 ie
> using reflection as necessary.
>
> If not, we may just wait for the next release of FOP, and support only
> that.
>
> thanks .. Jason
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 8:44 PM, Mehdi Houshmand <med1985@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jason,
>>
>> The backwards incompatibility of this API has been discussed quite a lot,
>> and I'm sorry you're having these issues. If you're looking for examples
>> for how to configure the new FopFactory, I'd say look in the source [1],
>> there are plenty of examples on how to do it, there's also quite a bit of
>> information on the wiki [2].
>>
>> Sorry for the inconvenience,
>>
>> Mehdi
>>
>> [1]
>> http://svn.eu.apache.org/viewvc/xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/examples/embedding/java/embedding/
>> [2] http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/FopFactoryConfiguration
>>
>>
>> On 8 November 2012 01:54, Jason Harrop <jharrop@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I maintain the docx4j project
>>>
>>> I reported https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54094 which
>>> was apparently fixed in July, but didn't make it into FOP 1.1 (just
>>> released).
>>>
>>> So, I thought I'd test a FOP nightly (20121107) to verify it has been
>>> fixed.
>>>
>>> But config seems to have changed extensively post 1.1
>>>
>>> Post 1.1, I can see FopFactoryBuilder, mentioned at
>>> http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/FopFactoryConfiguration which
>>> contains
>>>
>>>     public FopFactoryBuilder setConfiguration(Configuration cfg) {
>>>         fopFactoryConfigBuilder.setConfiguration(cfg);
>>>         return this;
>>>     }
>>>
>>> but that class didn't make it into 1.1 (it has FopFactoryConfigurator)
>>>
>>> So, Is it feasible/sensible to try to be interchangeable between FOP 1.1
>>> and whatever is to come?  Has someone written code which facilitates this?
>>>
>>> Please excuse if there are posts on this topic already.
>>>
>>> thanks .. Jason
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message