xmlgraphics-fop-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Terence M. Bandoian" <tere...@tmbsw.com>
Subject Re: Improving FOP Performance
Date Tue, 18 Mar 2014 18:04:19 GMT
On 3/18/2014 11:09 AM, Gonzalo Vasquez wrote:
> I'm into that, but I guess there might be some first parts to look 
> before I dig thaaat deep ;)
>
> Gonzalo Vásquez Sáez
> Gerente Investigación y Desarrollo (R&D)
> Altiuz Soluciones Tecnológicas de Negocios Ltda.
> Av. Nueva Tajamar 555 Of. 802, Las Condes - CP 7550099
> +56 2 335 2461
> gvasquez@altiuz.cl
> http://www.altiuz.cl
> http://www.altiuzreports.com
>
>
>
> El 18-03-2014, a las 9:22, Paul Womack <support@papermule.co.uk> escribió:
>
> Gonzalo Vasquez wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> We've been doing some performance tests using several output formats 
> (PDF, PostScript and AFP), and they al give us about the same time 
> results, which are far from what we expected. I'm aware that there are 
> several bits of Apache FOP which might me tweaked, but any suggestions 
> would be appreciated for improving performance.
>
> Use a profiling tool? Or is that too obvious?
>
> BugBear
>
>

Hi, Gonzalo-

You may want to consider reusing FopFactory and TransformerFactory 
instances.  That would help if multiple documents are generated in a 
given "run".  Also, JVM start time may be included in the performance 
results.

Using a profiler sounds like a good idea.

-Terence Bandoian


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org


Mime
View raw message