xmlgraphics-fop-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Matthew R. Wilson" <mwil...@mattwilson.org>
Subject Re: keep-together question
Date Tue, 01 Mar 2016 20:19:43 GMT
Just wanted to follow up on this --

Andreas, I applied your patch in FOP-1488. There were some rejected
chunks against svn-trunk which I didn't investigate too closely, but it
looked like they were in areas that I'm not using (such as tables), so I
just ignored those and they didn't break the build. The good news is the
parts that did apply successfully added working widow and orphan
support, so I've been playing around with that per your suggestion and
it is giving me pretty good results. Thank you!


On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 10:34:37AM -0800, Matthew R. Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 09:45:09PM +0100, Andreas Delmelle wrote:
> > While I can't speak to the integer-keep support, from what I can make
> > out here, it does seem like you would be greatly helped by decent
> > orphans/widows support.
> Hmm...an interesting idea. My example was simplified; in reality there
> are differences in the content that will make it much less predictable
> in terms of how many lines would fit on the page. But perhaps with some
> experimentation an estimate in the right ballpark would be better than
> nothing.
> > The good news: there is a patch available in JIRA (look for FOP-1488),
> > which I worked on quite some time back [...]
> > 
> > Are you fluent enough in Subversion, Ant etc. to check out the trunk,
> > apply the patch and build FOP
> Yep, if I find some free time this weekend I'll take a look at that and
> build a version with the patch applied.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org

View raw message